Skip to main content

View in English
हिंदी में देखें

Chapter 2 - Nationalism in India– Class 10 History Smart Notes (CBSE)

These comprehensive notes cover the complete development of Indian nationalism from its early stirrings to the mass movements led by Gandhi, with detailed explanations of strategies, social dimensions, and the complex negotiations of identity in the anti-colonial struggle. Indian nationalism was forged in the crucible of colonial oppression, but it was not a simple story of unity - it involved difficult negotiations between different communities, classes, and visions of India.


1. The Colonial Context: Where Nationalism Took Root

Indian Nationalism did not emerge in a vacuum. It grew as a response to specific colonial policies and experiences that created a shared sense of grievance among diverse Indian communities. Understanding the colonial context is essential to understanding why nationalism took the forms it did.

Economic Drain & Exploitation
The Foundation of Resentment: British colonial rule systematically extracted wealth from India. Dadabhai Naoroji's "Drain Theory" (1867) mathematically demonstrated how Britain drained India's resources:
  • Unpaid Exports: India exported raw materials but didn't receive fair payment.
  • Home Charges: India paid for British administration, wars, and pensions.
  • Destruction of Industries: Traditional industries (especially textiles) were ruined by British policies.
This economic exploitation created a cross-class basis for nationalism - both peasants and emerging Indian industrialists suffered.
Cultural Arrogance & Racism The Psychological Wound: British rule was justified by theories of racial and cultural superiority. Indians were portrayed as backward, superstitious, and incapable of self-rule. The "civilizing mission" ideology was deeply humiliating to educated Indians who knew their own civilization's achievements. This cultural insult fueled a desire to reclaim dignity and self-respect through self-rule.

Memory Trick: Remember the three D's that fueled early nationalism: Drain of wealth (economic), Denial of dignity (cultural), Discrimination (political and social). These created the shared grievances around which nationalism cohered.

2. The First World War: The Pressure Cooker Effect

The War (1914-1918) acted as an accelerator of nationalist sentiment. It exposed the contradictions of colonial rule and raised expectations that were brutally dashed.

Wartime Hardships & Broken Promises
From Sacrifice to Betrayal:
  • Massive Indian Contribution: 1.3 million Indian soldiers fought; India supplied food, money, and materials.
  • Heavy Burden on People: Forced recruitment in some areas, war loans, inflation (prices doubled 1913-1918), taxes increased.
  • The Promise: British hints of political reforms ("fighting for freedom" of small nations).
  • The Betrayal: After war, instead of self-government, repressive Rowlatt Act continued wartime restrictions.
This gap between sacrifice and reward created explosive anger.
1918-1919: The Perfect Storm
Crisis Upon Crisis:
  • Crop Failure & Famine: 1918-19 saw widespread crop failure in many regions.
  • Influenza Pandemic: 12-13 million Indians died (5% of population), more than all war casualties worldwide.
  • Economic Distress: Soldiers returning to unemployment, peasants to debt.
  • Political Repression: Rowlatt Act threatened basic rights.
People were suffering, angry, and politically awakened - ready for mass mobilization.

3. Gandhi's Arrival: A New Political Language

Gandhi returned to India in 1915, not as an unknown figure but as someone who had developed and tested his methods in South Africa. He didn't just join the nationalist movement - he transformed its language, methods, and social base.

Satyagraha: Truth-Force as Political Weapon
Revolutionary Methodology: Satyagraha was not merely "passive resistance" or "non-violence." It was an active, militant philosophy:
  • Moral Confrontation: The satyagrahi seeks to confront the opponent with truth, not avoid conflict.
  • Suffering as Strength: Willingness to suffer without retaliation demonstrates moral superiority.
  • Conversion, Not Defeat: The goal is to "win over" the opponent through appeal to conscience.
  • Mass Participation: Unlike earlier elite politics, satyagraha could involve millions.
The Genius: This method turned colonial violence (which was real and brutal) into proof of colonial immorality.
Early Experiments: Laboratory of Resistance
Testing Grounds:
  • Champaran (1917): Indigo peasants. Gandhi's method: detailed investigation, moral appeal to landlords, mobilization of peasants. Result: Champaran Agrarian Act gave some relief.
  • Ahmedabad (1918): Mill workers. Used hunger strike (first time) as pressure tactic.
  • Kheda (1918): Peasants hit by crop failure. Organized refusal to pay revenue.
These established Gandhi's credibility across different social groups and regions.

Exam Trick: When discussing Gandhi's early satyagrahas, don't just list them. Explain what each tested: Champaran tested mass peasant mobilization; Ahmedabad tested industrial conflict resolution; Kheda tested revenue refusal. Each was a laboratory experiment for techniques used later nationally.

4. 1919: The Turning Point - From Request to Demand

This year marked the transition from seeking reforms within the British system to demanding the system's end.

The Rowlatt Act: Colonial Logic Exposed
The "Black Act": Passed despite unanimous Indian opposition in Legislative Council. Key provisions:
  • Arrest without warrant
  • Detention without trial
  • No right to know accusers or evidence
  • Trials without juries
The Symbolism: After Indian war sacrifices, this was the "reward" - a permanent emergency. It revealed that colonial rule was fundamentally based on coercion, not consent.
Jallianwala Bagh: The Unforgivable Crime
April 13, 1919: General Dyer's troops fired on peaceful gathering in enclosed park with few exits.

Why This Was Different: Earlier violence (like 1857 suppression) could be framed as "restoring order." Jallianwala was cold, calculated massacre of unarmed civilians including women and children.

British Response Made It Worse: Dyer was initially celebrated by some British; House of Lords supported him; collection for his "defence fund." This showed a racial contempt that shocked even moderate Indians.

Tagore's Protest: Returned his knighthood saying "The time has come when badges of honour make our shame glaring."

5. Non-Cooperation & Khilafat: Unlikely Alliance

The period 1920-22 saw the first truly mass nationalist movement, made possible by an alliance between Congress and Muslim leadership around the Khilafat issue.

The Khilafat Issue
Islamic Concern Becomes National Issue: After WWI, Britain planned to dismantle Ottoman Empire and remove Caliph (Khalifa), spiritual leader of Muslims worldwide.
  • Indian Muslim Leaders: Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali mobilized Muslims.
  • Gandhi's Insight: Saw opportunity to unite Hindus and Muslims.
  • The Bargain: Muslims join Non-Cooperation; Congress supports Khilafat demand.
This created unprecedented Hindu-Muslim unity in early 1920s.
Non-Cooperation: The Withdrawal of Consent
Gandhi's Argument: British rule depended on Indian cooperation. If Indians withdrew cooperation in every sphere, the structure would collapse.

The Program: 1. Surrender titles (like "Rai Bahadur") given by British 2. Boycott government schools and colleges 3. Boycott law courts 4. Boycott legislative councils (elections) 5. Boycott foreign goods 6. Refuse recruitment to police/military

Positive Program: Establish national schools, arbitrate disputes through panchayats, use khadi.
How Different Groups Participated
A Movement of Many Meanings:
  • Students: Left government schools in thousands; joined national schools.
  • Lawyers: Including future leaders like Nehru, Patel quit practice.
  • Peasants (Awadh): Under Baba Ramchandra, protested high rents, begar (forced labour). "Swaraj" meant end to landlord oppression.
  • Plantation Workers (Assam): Left plantations believing "swaraj" meant right to return to villages.
  • Alluri Sitarama Raju led armed rebellion against forest laws restricting shifting cultivation.
Key Point: Each group understood "swaraj" in its own way - there was no single meaning.

Memory Trick: Remember Non-Cooperation through the "3B Framework": Boycott (institutions/goods), Build (alternatives like national schools), Broaden (social base across regions/communities).

6. The Strategic Retreat: Chauri Chaura & Movement Withdrawal

Gandhi's sudden calling off of the movement after Chauri Chaura violence (February 1922) remains controversial but reveals his strategic thinking.

What Happened at Chauri Chaura February 4, 1922: In small town in Gorakhpur district, police fired on peaceful protestors. Crowd retaliated, attacked police station, set it on fire killing 22 policemen. This was not isolated - similar violence occurred elsewhere.
Why Gandhi Withdrew the Movement
More Than Principle - Strategy: 1. Control Issue: If movement couldn't be kept non-violent, it would justify massive British repression. 2. Timing: Movement was already showing signs of fatigue; better to withdraw while still strong. 3. Discipline Preparation: Needed to train more satyagrahis in strict non-violence. 4. Prevent Radicalization: Some groups (like Gudem rebels) were taking up arms - Gandhi wanted to maintain his method's purity.

Criticism: Many nationalists (including Nehru) felt this was a mistake when movement was at peak.

7. Towards Complete Independence: 1920s Evolution

The period between Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience saw important ideological and organizational developments.

Simon Commission Backlash (1928)
All-White Commission: Appointed to recommend constitutional reforms, but had no Indian member.
  • "Go Back Simon" Protests: Nationwide black flag demonstrations.
  • Lala Lajpat Rai's Death: Beaten during Lahore protest, died weeks later. Created martyr.
  • Indian Response: Congress appointed Motilal Nehru Committee to draft Indian constitution - first comprehensive Indian proposal.
Lahore Congress (1929) - The Purna Swaraj Turn
December 1929: Under young Jawaharlal Nehru's presidency, Congress made historic shift:
  • Rejected Dominion Status: Earlier goal was "dominion status" (self-rule within British Empire like Canada).
  • Adopted Purna Swaraj: Complete independence as goal.
  • January 26, 1930: Declared as Independence Day, with flag hoisting and pledge taking nationwide.
This formalized the break from seeking reforms within British system to demanding its end.

8. Salt Satyagraha: Masterstroke of Symbolic Politics

The Civil Disobedience Movement (1930-34) began with Gandhi's choice of salt as an issue - a brilliant symbolic move.

Why Salt Was Brilliant
The Perfect Issue: 1. Universal Impact: Everyone used salt, rich and poor. 2. Clear Injustice: Salt tax hit poorest hardest. 3. Simple Action: Making salt was easy to understand and replicate. 4. British Vulnerability: Attacked monopoly that yielded relatively small revenue - exposed pettiness of colonial rule. 5. Media Spectacle: 240-mile march with international journalists created global drama.

Gandhi's Letter to Viceroy: "If my letter makes no appeal to your heart, I shall proceed with such co-workers of the Ashram as I can take, to disregard the provisions of the salt laws." The British underestimated its power.
The Dandi March Narrative
March 12 - April 6, 1930:
  • 78 Carefully Chosen Volunteers: From different regions, religions, castes.
  • Daily Rituals: Morning prayers, spinning, evening meetings in villages.
  • Growing Procession: Thousands joined along the way.
  • April 6: At Dandi sea shore, Gandhi picked up natural salt. Signal for nationwide salt-making.
  • Mass Participation: Coastal areas from Bengal to Bombay saw people making salt.
The march was covered by international press, embarrassing Britain globally.
Beyond Salt: The Movement Expands
Multiple Forms of Disobedience:
  • Forest Law Violation: Tribal entered reserved forests.
  • Peasants refused land revenue.
  • Foreign Boycott: Picketing of cloth/liquor shops.
  • Women's Participation: Unprecedented numbers, especially in picketing and salt making.
By mid-1930, over 90,000 arrested including most Congress leaders.

9. The Limits of Inclusion: Who Was Left Behind?

While Civil Disobedience was massive, it also revealed the limits of Congress's ability to represent all Indians.

Dalits & Ambedkar's Challenge
A Different Vision: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar argued Dalits needed political power, not just social reform:
  • Separate Electorates Demand: Dalits should elect their own representatives.
  • Critique of Congress: Saw it as dominated by upper castes; temple entry etc. didn't address political/economic power.
  • 1932: Poona Pact Compromise: After British granted separate electorates, Gandhi fasted against it. Result: More reserved seats but within general electorates.
This tension between social justice and national unity was never fully resolved.
Muslim Alienation Grows
After Khilafat Disappointment: Turkish themselves abolished Caliphate in 1924.
  • Communal Tensions: Mid-1920s saw Hindu-Muslim riots in many cities.
  • Separate Organizations: Muslim League revived; Hindu Mahasabha grew.
  • Different Priorities: Muslims feared majority rule might mean Hindu domination.
  • Congress Mistakes: Sometimes allied with Hindu communal groups; didn't consistently address Muslim concerns.
By 1930s, many Muslims were lukewarm to Civil Disobedience.

Exam Insight: The "limits of nationalism" question is crucial. Don't just list groups left out - analyze why they were left out. Dalits wanted political representation, not just end to untouchability. Muslims feared majoritarian democracy. Rich peasants wanted economic relief. Industrial workers wanted labor rights. Each had different priorities that "swaraj" didn't automatically address.

10. Cultural Nationalism: Creating "India" in Imagination

Beyond politics, nationalism was built through cultural symbols that created emotional attachment to the idea of India.

Bharat Mata: The Nation as Goddess
Abanindranath Tagore's Painting (1905): Depicted India as ascetic goddess, serene, spiritual.
  • Multiple Meanings: For some religious devotion; for others secular symbol of motherland.
  • Worship Rituals: In meetings, Bharat Mata images worshipped with patriotic songs.
  • Controversy: Could exclude non-Hindus; alternative secular symbols like flag developed.
Nationalist Iconography
  • Flag: Evolved through several designs to tricolor with charkha (later Ashoka Chakra).
  • Anthems & Songs: Vande Mataram (from Bankim's Anandamath) became nationalist hymn despite controversy over its Hindu imagery.
  • History Rewriting: Nationalist historians highlighted ancient Indian achievements, resistance to invaders.
  • Collected folk tales, songs as "authentic" Indian culture.
  • Charkha (spinning wheel) symbolized self-reliance, anti-industrial simplicity.
These created a shared visual and emotional language of nationalism.

11. Essential Timeline

1915 Gandhi returns to India; begins understanding Indian conditions
1917-1918 Champaran, Ahmedabad, Kheda satyagrahas - Gandhi's "laboratory"
1919 Rowlatt Act; Jallianwala Bagh massacre - turning point
1920-1922 Non-Cooperation & Khilafat Movement - first mass movement
1922 Chauri Chaura violence; Gandhi calls off movement
1928 Simon Commission protests; Lala Lajpat Rai dies
1929 Lahore Congress; Purna Swaraj demand
1930 Salt March; Civil Disobedience begins
1932 Poona Pact on Dalit representation

12. Key Personalities & Their Contributions

Mahatma Gandhi Transformed nationalism from elite politics to mass movement; developed satyagraha as method; emphasized Hindu-Muslim unity; broadened social base to include peasants, women.
Jawaharlal Nehru Modernizer & Socialist; advocated industrialization, secularism; as 1929 Congress president pushed for Purna Swaraj; connected Indian struggle with anti-fascism globally.
Subhas Chandra Bose Radical Alternative to Gandhi; believed in more militant methods; organized Indian National Army during WWII; popular slogan "Give me blood and I will give you freedom."
Bhagat Singh Revolutionary Socialist; executed at 23; represented radical youth alternative to Gandhian non-violence; emphasized social revolution alongside independence.
B.R. Ambedkar Dalit Perspective; demanded political rights and social justice; criticized Congress for neglecting Dalits; principal architect of Indian Constitution.
Muhammad Ali Jinnah Initially for Hindu-Muslim unity; later advocated separate Muslim political interests; by 1940 demanding Pakistan; represents the alternative Muslim nationalist trajectory.

Revision Checklist: Think Like an Examiner

Explain how colonial policies created shared grievances enabling nationalism
Analyze why WWI was a turning point in nationalist expectations
Describe Gandhi's satyagraha as distinct from mere "non-violence"
Evaluate the significance of Jallianwala Bagh in changing nationalist strategy
Explain the logic and limits of Non-Cooperation-Khilafat alliance
Analyze why different social groups participated and what they wanted
Assess Gandhi's decision to withdraw Non-Cooperation after Chauri Chaura
Explain the symbolic genius of choosing salt for Civil Disobedience
Analyze the different perspectives of Dalits and Muslims on nationalism
Describe how cultural symbols created emotional attachment to "India"

Ultimate Exam Strategy: Indian nationalism questions typically test understanding of change over time (how methods/ goals evolved), diversity of perspectives (different groups/leaders), and connection between methods and mass mobilization. Always structure answers to show you understand nationalism was not monolithic but a contested, evolving phenomenon with internal debates and limitations.

Note: The story of Indian nationalism is not just about "how India got freedom" but about how diverse people came to imagine themselves as a nation. It involves political strategy, social mobilization, cultural creation, and difficult negotiations between different visions of what India should be. The tensions visible then - between secular and religious nationalism, between social justice and national unity, between non-violence and militancy - continue to shape Indian politics today.