Skip to main content

View in English
हिंदी में देखें


this padding is for avoiding search bar cut

Teacher’s Insight – Class 10 Civics Chapter 1: Power Sharing | CBSE | GPN

👨‍🏫 Teacher's Insight

Students, power-sharing isn't just a textbook concept—it's India's survival formula. Understanding why we share power explains how our democracy functions despite incredible diversity.

💡 The Big Idea

Power-sharing isn't about weakening the government; it's about strengthening democracy by including diverse groups, preventing conflict, and ensuring stability.

1. The 4 Forms Framework
Don't just list—understand purpose:
1. Horizontal: Checks and balances (legislature, executive, judiciary)
2. Vertical: Accommodates regional diversity (central, state, local)
3. Community: Protects minority interests (reserved constituencies, cultural rights)
4. Coalition: Political necessity becomes democratic virtue (multi-party alliances)
Each serves different democratic needs.
2. Belgium vs. Sri Lanka – The Contrast Method
These aren't just examples—they're teaching tools:
Belgium: Accommodated diversity → stability, development
Sri Lanka: Majoritarianism → conflict, civil war, economic loss
Key difference: Belgium shared power, Sri Lanka concentrated it
Lesson: How you manage diversity determines national fate
3. Horizontal Power-sharing in India
Beyond textbook points:
Legislature: Makes laws, but needs President's assent
Executive: Implements laws, but accountable to Legislature
Judiciary: Reviews laws, but doesn't make them
Key concept: Separation of powers ≠ complete separation—they're interdependent
Indian twist: Parliamentary system means executive from legislature
4. Why Majoritarianism Fails
Sri Lanka case teaches:
1. Majority rule ≠ democratic if it ignores minority rights
2. Imposing one language/religion creates alienation
3. Political exclusion leads to violent resistance
4. Economic discrimination deepens divisions
5. Once conflict starts, it's hard to stop
Apply this to any "majority-minority" question.
5. Coalition Governments – Beyond "Weak" Label
Examiners want nuanced view:
Challenges: Instability, slow decisions, compromises
Benefits: Broader representation, checks on authoritarianism, regional voice
Indian experience: 1990s taught coalition politics, now institutionalized
Current relevance: Most states have coalition/regional parties in power
6. Common Conceptual Mistakes
• Confusing "power-sharing" with "power division" (sharing = participation, division = separation)
• Thinking federalism is only power-sharing between center and states (it's also with local governments)
• Saying "India copied Belgium model" (we have unique system combining various forms)
• Believing "more power-sharing means weaker government" (actually increases legitimacy)
• Missing that power-sharing happens even within same community (different parties, ideologies)
7. Answer Writing Strategy
For "Why power-sharing is desirable":
1. Prudential reason: Reduces conflict (use Sri Lanka example)
2. Moral reason: Democratic spirit (use Belgium example)
3. Practical benefits: Stability, inclusivity, better decisions
4. Indian context: Diverse society needs it to function
5. Conclusion: Essential for democracy in plural societies
8. Current Applications
Link to present:
• Reservation system (community power-sharing)
• Coalition politics at center and states
• Linguistic states reorganization (accommodating diversity)
• Special status for some states (Article 370 was example)
• Local governments (73rd/74th amendments)
• Increasing women's participation (recent bills)
9. Comparing Different Forms
When asked to compare:
Similarity: All aim to include people in governance
Difference: Who shares with whom (organs, levels, communities, parties)
Effectiveness: Depends on context—no single best form
Indian combination: We use all four forms simultaneously
Example: A law needs legislature (horizontal), state implementation (vertical), minority safeguards (community), and multi-party support (coalition)
10. Revision Essentials
Final checklist:
1. 4 forms with one Indian example each
2. Belgium-Sri Lanka comparison in 3 points
3. Difference between prudential and moral reasons
4. One argument for and against coalition governments
5. How power-sharing strengthens (not weakens) democracy
6. Connect to next chapter (power-sharing leads to federalism)

⚖️ Quick Concept Clarifier

If you're confused:

Forms mixed up? → Horizontal = same level, Vertical = different levels
Examples confusing? → Belgium = success story, Sri Lanka = cautionary tale
Why necessary? → Diverse society + Democracy = Must share power
Coalition governments? → Compromise needed but more representative
Prudential vs moral? → Prudential = practical, Moral = ethical

Remember: India's diversity is managed, not eliminated, through power-sharing.

Unity in diversity isn't a slogan—it's a governance challenge solved through power-sharing.

– Your Political Science Teacher
Guided Path Noida